This example is a purer form of cinematic display of the subject's masturbation. It foregrounds the mediation on the part of the girl - that is the "director" of the clip.
She sits in an anonymous location, clearly in front of a camera or computer webcam on the ground in a awkward position with unrefined lighting. She has a hand-held flashlight and the remote for the camera explicitly to help with the display to come.
She spreads her pussy shows us her vagina and clitoris in extreme close up - she shines the light right onto her open pussy for about 5 minutes in, using it as a masturbation aid. She zooms the camera in and out with the remote numerous times, zooming or shifting it at different points, depending upon her angle, her posture, and legs. The remote, for the first half of the clip (which is an astounding 20+ minutes), is off camera (her hand goes off screen) but by 2nd third, her remote controlling is on camera, between her legs. Effectively and almost symbolically, in the last 5 minutes, she puts the remote on the ground between her legs, and it is partially in view in the foreground, reminding us continuously that there is a camera there to control, that she controlled it, and that she is not currently doing so.
We will see her reach for the remote at one point to adjust the angle for us.
Her face is off screen. She seems to be seeing exactly what the view is, which is close, rather close and gynocological. This clearly makes explicit her interaction with the image we are now watching. She is mediating it, changing it, moving in closer as she seems to revel in the frenzy of sexual excitation.
This extreme detail - hairy pussy and all - is not the "standard" view which, for women masturbation videos, often includes as much of the woman's body as possible. And often their faces (which brings their authenticity into question. Would a true "amateur" let her face be seen on such a clip on the internet, even though it presumably is listed "anonymously" on the site in question and the chances of an aquaintance seeing it seems very slim? A professional or semi-pro pornstar would have less qualms about being seen and identified (and takes "credit" for the clip in the process.).
(Men's "amateur" webcam as a genre often are positioned much closer to their genitals, partly as an anonymity masker, and perhaps more importantly, the male psyche is more focussed on the actual hard penis alone and its erect and ejaculating spectacle than the body surrounding it, the whole "person" presented as a sexual being.)
The image is clear and unflattering. Her pussy with untrimmed (but neat) hair - running down to her perineum and towards her asshole - is an anomaly except in clearly amateur clips (with performers without the look of "classical" pornstars). Her fingers clearly get wet about 9 minutes in, and she bucks, seemingly having an orgasm. The resultant close-up seems to verify that orgasmic liquid - thick and creamy, is running out of her vagina. Her fingers are slick as she continues to finger herself, and the show may be over. Yet she continues, and turns on her side, eventually sticking a nail polish bottle into her asshole.
This clear and unique exhibition of sexual excitement is evidence of true sexual arousal on the subject's part. More suspicious "amateur" clips often fake arousal... because they have to.
This 20 minute clip approaches documentary versimilitude, in its (intentional) misframing and presentation, it's overly explicit presentation of hairy and wet vagina, between-the-legs angles, awkward but intense display of labia, clitoris and masturbation, it's foregrounded use of low-tech mediation techniques (the remote on screen) rather than successfully hiding them (or pretending they don't exist).
The artifice adds completely to the aesthetic pleasure of the clip.
* * *
Updated/re-upped 6/7/11 - original seems to intermittently be not available.
No comments:
Post a Comment